Some more fun with Google Earth.

Presenting the last five Pritzker winners, draped over the terrain like drunken floozies.

flat herzog and de meuron

2001 - Herzog and the Meuron.

flat umurcutt

2002 - Our Glen, and the Arthur Boyd Centre on the Shoalhaven River

flat utzon

2003 - Jorn Utzon. For some reason Sydney EVERY SINGLE CITY with an Utzon building has a ultra low-res information in Google Earth…

flat zaha

2004 - Zaha Hadid. The Rosenthal Centre for Contemporary Art in Cincinnati, admirably rendered by Google Earth in a manner none too disimilar to Mrs Hadid’s own.

flat morphosis

2005 - Thom Mayne/Morphosis and the Kickass Diamond Ranch High School.


In our first year of studying architecture, before we knew which way the arrows on stairs pointed, Brett Boardman taught us to draw plans, sections and axonometrics using rotring and t-squares. Useless skills it turns out, but fun at the time. At some point he decided he preferred taking photos of buildings to administering Small Building Works contracts and officially became the worlds nicest photographer.

He was recently named the Canon Australian Photographer of the Year.


Here I was, sitting at home getting all excited about on-demand radio when I am pointed to Google Earth. Holy Fuck. We live in the future.

Here is The Powers of Five: from The Infinite Void to Corona Del Mar:

powers of five

x100000*

powers of five

x10000

powers of five

x1000

powers of five

x100

powers of five

x10

I am guessing that it will be a little while until the next Five levels of magnification are available to us punters, but you never know - all those CSI-Insert American City shows seem to have access to the technology.

* Do not scale drawings.


The always excellent Archidose this week features an installation by Hal Ingberg Architects. Apart from being given the unfortunate moniker of “Coloured Reflections: Wrapping and Framing Savage Nature”, it is a stunning little pavilion. Head on over to Archidose for more images, words, etc.

hal ingberg pavilion

Photo by Hal Ingberg.


A little while ago a group of us, spurred on by Tim, started up the young architects committee at the RAIA. The Institute currently has a noticeable lack of recently graduated youth in its ranks and it is our agenda to change that. I am not sure how we will do this but we have called ourselves DARCH and we are going to start with the humble ol’ slide night.

It will be at Tusculum and named 10×10x10, it will be a rapid fire slide night. 10 presenters will each present 10 slides each with a maximum of 10 seconds per slide with drinks before, during and after. If you know how to do complex maths, like I do, you will have already figured out that there is a much higher ratio of drinking and talking time to politely watching slide time. I will put up a list of the 10 folk doing the powerpoint thing closer to the date, when we have them all confirmed.

Below is our suitably grim/We-Are-The-Business invite:

10x10x10 flyer

It is on the 21st of July so if you are:

  • a) Sydney. Or Australia for that matter…
  • b) Hardcore
  • c) A youngish architect
  • d) Whatever

Then come along. It should be fun.


A little while ago I mentioned that I posting was going to be a little slow as I had a competition to work on. If you don’t remember, I believe my exact words were that I had masterpieces to design.

The competition was for a National Police Memorial in Canberra. The results were announced today and I came equal third. Which I am happy with. The thing was never going to stand up anyway; it was totally going to fall over without warning.

The winner is a variation on a theme set in place by Maya Lin and does not excite me a great deal. To me, second place was probably a stronger scheme and had some beautiful drawings. The other 76 entries can be seen here.

My proposal looked to create a memorial that was not a wall with names on it. It used the elements of column and roof to express the idea of a heavy load being carried by many. The roof folds down to collect water and brass windchimes echo the bells of the nearby carillon. I thought everyone dug windchimes. Seems I was mistaken.

national police memorial

Anyway here are all the A1 boards:

national police memorial

Site Plan

national police memorial

Plans

national police memorial

Perspective.

national police memorial

Section and Elevation.

national police memorial

And finally, a particularly high contrast day on Lake Burley Griffin…


Anyone who has been lucky enough to have had anything at all to do with Antoinette will know exactly why I am so head over heels smitten with her.

engaged

On Sunday we got engaged and I have never ever been happier.


A couple of weeks ago I asked if anyone could confirm my suspicion that Nouvel’s Agbar Tower was indeed in the background of Revenge of the Sith. Well, reports have begun to trickle in and it seems that I was not mistaken, that it really is there. Although as reader, N. Verzivolli points out, it was not in Naboo but Alderaan:

“Apparently, when George Lucas was coming up with ideas for designs of the civilizations of this film, he wanted Alderaan to appear to be like the most “advanced civilization there was in that galaxy” but that they were still very in tune with nature, thus the high tech
skyscrapers in the alps, as was seen in the movie. I think maybe what happened is that one of the designers on the film had seen the Torre Agbar somewhere, and decided to incorporate a variation of it into the film, because it really does look like it.”

As we all know Alderaan is blown to pieces by the Death Star in Episode Four, a long long time ago. Which makes Nouvel’s blatant historical referencing a little disappointing.


Not content with waiting for the arrival of the fourth dimension into our volumetric world, Graphisoft is unveiling 5D CAD. That’s right FIVE Ds. The first three Ds are familiar to us all and the fourth D is generally considered to be something to do with time. I, like you, am always in favour of CAD packages incorporating more dimensions and I remember seeing some documentary about string theory where they talked about all sorts of different dimensions. Like, 25D and 17D. I shudder to imagine the glasses they would make you wear at a 17D Imax movie but I think that architects will only benefit from access to extra planes of being.

To be honest though, I had never thought the manipulation of other dimensions would be a feature of CAD in my lifetime. I did not even consider that I would ever be able to warp space-time from within Microstation and as such, am a little shocked to hear that they are going straight from 3D to 5. And more than a little shocked by what the Fifth Dimension has in store for us all because it seems, from the Graphisoft press release, that the Fifth dimension is none other than … wait for it … Cost Management/Cash Flow Forecasting! Gosh!

Really? Length, Breadth, Height, Time, Cash Flow Forecasting…

I guess it makes sense.


Today’s issue of Domain in the Sydney Morning Herald had a cover story about owner-builders. It was essentially about how you can save money by not hiring a professional to do the job but to do it yourself. Just as it is cheaper for me to rewire my entire apartment than it is to hire an electrician. Cheaper and only fourteen thousand times more dangerous.

In a box at the end of the article they had another little handy hint for the folks at home, which essentially read: you don’t need an architect, all you need is the Building Code of Australia. I am not sure if they have had a flick through the BCA, but it is a fairly impenetrable document for architects and builders to use let alone Mary-Jo and Steve who want to design their new dream home. It is also a document full of fire ratings and ramp gradients with absolutely no design related content.

Anyway, here is what the Sydney Morning Herald would have you do:

Having drawn up some plans that comply with the Building Code of Australia, you then have the options of either submitting those directly to council, or taking them to a professional draftsperson.

Andrew Owens of interior and architecture consultancy Futurespace also suggests that where the site is particularly challenging or where an owner-builder feels that they’re not coming up with the best solution, they could approach an architect about developing a concept for the job for a set fee.

“You can say, ‘Look I’ll give you some money and I want you to come up with the scheme, but then Joe over here, who is a draftsperson, he can draw it up for me. And I’ll build it. But help me sort out the problems.’”

This is precisely the kind of crap the RAIA should be speaking out against.


Matt has bought The Tangent project to my attention.

tangent

It is a new headquarters for Hyundai by Daniel Libeskind. On his website, Daniel explains why it is called the Tangent Building:

‘The Tangent is a project that is about the relationship between the ever changing circle of nature and the straight line of technology. In the contact between the circle and the line, one can see the meeting between the wheel and its path. Through their mutual engagement, nature gives reality to machines and machines extend nature to new and unknown horizons.’

Disregarding the rubbish about circles representing nature and pushing to the side, just for a moment, the fact that Moore’s Law has predicted accurately that technology follows an exponential curve rather than a straight line, I would like to talk a little about elementary geometry. The stuff you learn when you first go to Big School:

tangent

In the image above on the left we have a circle and on the right we have a line. This is easy and we probably learnt it before big school. We are interested in what happens when the two combine though. Lets have a look.

tangent

Here we have on the left, a line crossing through a circle. This is called a chord. On the right, however, we have a line that juuuuuust touches the circle ever so lightly. So lightly in fact that the point where the two touch is infintely small! This is called a Tangent* and is the namesake of the Hyundai Corporate HQ.

So we can see that the Tangent building in fact contains no tangents. Which begs the question, if you are going to post-rationalise a design, why not make the explanation at least partly relevant to the scheme? It is lazy and insulting to assume that if you throw enough catchphrases and buzz words in the air, people will be dazzled by your genius and not ask any questions.

Others have written much more clearly on the misuse of words so I will allow Mr Orwell to finish up for me:

“The inflated style itself is a kind of euphemism. A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outline and covering up all the details. The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. In our age there is no such thing as “keeping out of politics.” All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia.”

* A fun fact about tangents is that a line drawn from the centre of the circle to the point where the line meets the circle is perdincular to the tangent!

[UPDATE] Okay. Some readers have pointed out that there is, in fact a tangent present in the Tangent Building. See that enormous white shard crashing through the left hand side of the building? Well apparently it is a tangent to the circle on the facade. Whatever.